Know which transaction files
need attention before closing.
Your transaction-management platform already stores files and may already perform document checks. Kathisma is not trying to replace it. The question is whether brokerage leadership can quickly see which transactions actually need human attention before closing — and why.
Synthetic Ontario brokerage demonstration. No customer data. No legal or regulatory determination.Start with the files that warrant attention.
Show why the exception exists before asking a human to act.
The demonstration follows a missing-signature issue through transaction context, documents, requirements, detection, priority, human review and resolution. The system surfaces evidence; the brokerage remains responsible for the decision.
Resale transaction · closing Sep 22.
Parties, closing timeline and active conditions establish the review context.
APS v2 · Amendment #1 · deposit receipt · FINTRAC artifacts.
Documents are interpreted as a set rather than as isolated files.
Current controlling APS should contain the expected execution evidence.
The demo does not present this as legal advice; it shows the configured brokerage review requirement.
Seller signature cannot be verified on the current APS version.
The earlier document contains a signature, but the controlling/current version must be resolved before the exception can be cleared.
Critical because closing is near and execution evidence is unresolved.
Timing and transaction context affect priority; not every missing artifact is equal.
Deal administrator reviews the source pages and version history.
Kathisma presents the evidence and uncertainty. The professional responsible for the file determines the resolution.
Correct executed version is supplied and confirmed by brokerage review.
The exception can then be marked resolved with the supporting artifact retained.
Detection, evidence, reviewer disposition and resolution stay linked.
The goal is auditable operating history, not an autonomous compliance conclusion.
Prove that context, change and controlling evidence matter.
72 Cedar Lane
An amendment changes the relevant term. The review must understand which version controls instead of checking forms independently.
505 Front Street
Two artifacts indicate different closing dates. The system flags the conflict and routes it for human resolution rather than pretending certainty.
14 Maple Crescent
A surfaced exception is reviewed and cleared by brokerage staff with rationale retained. Not every detection becomes an unresolved risk.
Move from synthetic workflow to a controlled paid evaluation.
The next commercial step is the C$5,000 Brokerage Transaction Assurance Audit, approximately two weeks. It is designed to examine the brokerage's real review workflow and establish whether a controlled pilot is warranted. It is not unrestricted production use and does not claim representative Ontario validation before the evidence, privacy, security and legal gates are satisfied.
Recommended founder pacing: queue 1 minute · Lakeshore transaction/evidence 2 minutes · exception/priority 1–2 minutes · human review/resolution 1–2 minutes · contrast cases 1 minute · Audit offer/questions 1 minute.